Ministers said to be soft on terrorism
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Ministers and police were accused of being slow or unwilling to tackle state sponsors of terrorism in Britain "for fear of losing trade and markets".
Evidence published with the Home Office inquiry report by Lord Lloyd of Berwick, a senior law lord, claims Britain is also putting exports above the fight against terrorism - a charge strongly denied last night.
The allegations, which have strong echoes of the charges against the Government in the Scott inquiry into the arms to Iraq scandal, were described as dynamite by opposition sources and are certain to lead to demands for action in the Commons next week.
Lord Lloyd is urging the Home Secretary, Michael Howard, to take new powers to tackle terrorist groups who use London as a base for raising money or organising acts of terrorism abroad. He calls for a change to the law on conspiracy to procedure those "who conspire to commit terrorist acts abroad". He also suggests copying the approach used by France and Germany to proscribe named terrorist organisations to ban them from fund- raising.
Lord Lloyd makes it clear that investigating trading links was not part of his remit for reviewing Britain's anti-terror laws, but volume two of the report contains a serious indictment of the authorities by Paul Wilkinson, professor of international relations at St Andrews University. "We should note the apparent reluctance of ministers and the police to utilise fully and rigorously the powers they already have to seek out terrorist assets and have them frozen, pending the result of criminal proceedings.
"There is a notable slowness (or unwillingness?) to use such powers against state sponsors of terrorism for fear of losing trade and markets," Professor Wilkinson asserts. The "present ambivalence" in the UK's policy towards Iran should be seen in the wider context that Iran is engaged with client Islamic groups in trying to undermine the Middle East peace process, which is so vital to future stability, he adds. "Yet Iran is being rewarded with more access to British trade and services."
The Home Office last night played down the allegations as an academic study.
"Obviously the professor is entitled to give his views but we are looking at the recommendations of Lord Lloyd, not at the academic report."
But Lord Lloyd says in his report that he has drawn heavily on the special report commissioned by his inquiry from Professor Wilkinson. Jack Straw, Labour's shadow home secretary, said: "These are very serious matters and Labour will be calling for Malcolm Rifkind (Foreign Secretary) to make a full explanation of these grave allegations." Britain has a trade embargo against selling military equipment to Iran but has no embargo for other goods. A bilateral agreement was recently agreed to repay pounds 20m in debts as a first step to lifting a block by the Exports Credit Guarantee Department on credit for Iran.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments