Millennium Bug Watch
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WOULD IT be a good idea or a bad idea for Hollywood to make a film about the millennium bug? It probably depends who you are.
Earlier this year, Warner Bros bought the screenplay for a film tentatively titled Y2K (the acronym for "year 2000"). It was described by those who had seen the script as "something like Deep Impact [in which a meteor hits the Earth], with the year 2000 in the background". Stu Zicherman, who wrote the screenplay, was justifiably excited at the deal: "In any movie, you're looking at a ticking clock, and this is the greatest ticking clock ever. It's one of the few deadlines in the history of the world you can't push back."
However, things have been a little quiet since, tempting some to suggest that Warner Bros has been leant upon by Washington experts who do not want people too worried about computers crashing everywhere. But some sources are suggesting that it is not conspiracy at all - and that Mr Zicherman was more correct than he realised.
The film executives have realised that if the film was released in the US in the autumn of 1999, as planned, then it would not reach its other English-speaking markets (such as Britain) for another three or four months - that is, after its watch-by date. A slightly less time-dependent treatment is now thought to be in the works.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments