Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Military advisers' warnings on exports to Iraq ignored

David Connett
Tuesday 11 May 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SENIOR civil servants ignored military advisers' warnings that British exports were being used by Iraq to set up a major arms manufacturing industry.

Iraq's capacity to wage war was greatly increased as a result of exports of British machine tools used to make missiles and munitions, the Scott inquiry heard yesterday.

Lieutenant-Colonel Richard Glazebrook, a senior Army officer who monitored the exports, told the inquiry that fears of a committee of Ministry of Defence advisers were ignored. He wrote a report warning of the Iraqi build-up and the involvement of British machine tool companies in an effort to get ministers to change export regulations. The report was backed up by military intelligence.

Despite that, the committee's views were not accurately reflected by its chairman - an MoD defence sales official - in an aide-memoire to the former Minister for Defence Procurement, Alan Clark. Mr Clark's evidence last year led to the collapse of an Old Bailey trial of three executives of the Coventry-based Matrix Churchill machine tool firm, accused of evading export controls.

The Government set up Lord Justice Scott's inquiry to investigate claims of collusion by ministers and civil servants in defence exports which breached official guidelines and export control legislation.

Mr Clark was told that there were no MoD security or operational objections to the export of machine tools to Iraq. But Lt-Col Glazebrook told the inquiry yesterday that that did not represent the view of the majority of military advisers on an MoD committee set up to vet defence equipment export applications.

Although export guidelines announced in Parliament remained unaltered, civil servants changed the interpretation of them to suit British political and industrial needs, he said. Despite a declared position of even-handed neutrality Britain increasingly favoured Iraq over Iran.

He said that he was the Army representative on the advisory group. Navy, RAF, military intelligence and defence scientific and technical advisers were also appointed. Exporters were represented by the MoD's own export service officials who frequently opposed recommendations by the military advisers to block licences. The committee became known as 'the branch which likes to say no', he said.

Military advisers were concerned about the export of machine tools to Iraq in 1987. Although strictly not 'lethal', the equipment, including computer-controlled lathes, could be used to make munitions.

Despite military intelligence warnings that the lathes were to be used to make half a million artillery shells a year for the Iraqi military, licences were approved by the Department of Trade and Industry. It argued that although some lathes went to an Iraqi company known to supply munitions the advisers could not prove the equipment was for military use as the company also produced civilian goods.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in