Michael Hickey on theft charge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Michael Hickey, one of the Bridgewater Four, was last night back in custody after being charged with theft and carrying an offensive weapon.
Mr Hickey, 36, was arrested in Birmingham city centre on Saturday, said West Midlands police.
He was taken to Steelhouse Lane police station and interviewed by detectives before being charged with theft and possessing an offensive weapon.
The charge is thought to be in connection with the alleged theft of a tray of gold rings from the city's Supergold store.
He is being held in custody and is due to appear before magistrates in Birmingham today.
Mr Hickey was one of four men jailed in 1979 for the murder of the paperboy Carl Bridgewater at Yew Tree Farm, Stourbridge.
He was ordered to be detained indefinitely while his cousin Vincent Hickey and James Robinson were given life. Pat Molloy was convicted of manslaughter.
The men, who always protested their innocence, became known as the Bridgewater Four during their campaign to have the convictions quashed.
After a long campaign, they were freed in February when the prosecution accepted that fresh evidence left the case against them fundamentally flawed.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments