Mencap in battle to keep homes contract
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Mencap is to seek an injunction barring North Birmingham Health Authority from terminating the charity's contract to manage three community care homes after the authority yesterday refused to back down and rescind the decision.
North Birmingham's refusal came as relatives of residents at the homes detailed some of the health authority's criticisms of Mencap's operation - but said they backed the charity retaining the contract.
Chris Stone, whose brother John, 39, a schizophrenic with Down's syndrome, is resident at one of the homes, said the care Mencap provided had been "wonderful".
"John is quite severely disabled. If he could speak, I'm sure he would say what I am saying. The staff have a marvellous relationship with the residents. John has improved since he has been there and is treated like an individual. As much as possible, given his disabilities, he is given choices," she said.
She had been told that when the health authority made unannounced visits officials had seen one woman incontinent with her blouse undone and in another case medication being forced on a resident.
Mencap had told her that the health authority had then refused to allow the charity's staff to talk to the person who made the report, making it difficult for the charity to challenge the charges.
She suspected there was "a hidden agenda". But Les Clarke, the authority's director of quality, denied any ulterior motive. "We had a number of concerns which were sufficiently serious for us to take the action we have," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments