Who's the toughest of them all?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Brian Walden asks nearly twice as many tough questions as David Frost. That, anyway, is the view of Dr Peter Bull, a psychology lecturer at York University who has closely studied the political interview. He has identified 35 separate verbal tech niques used by politicians to evade questions. Now in his latest unpublished research he has measured the comparative toughness of different interviewers. The table gives the proportion of each interviewer's questions that are "tough". Dr Bull classifies a question as tough if all possible response options would put the politician in a negative light in some way in the eyes of others.
The analysis is based on interviews conducted with the three party leaders during the 1992 general election. The three leaders were also interviewed by Jonathan Dimbleby, but, according to Dr Bull, no fair comparison could be made since Jonathan Dimblebyasks far fewer questions than any of his rivals.
"His style is quite different," says Dr Bull. "He relies more on a dialogue than a question-and-answer format."
Dr Bull's next research will examine whether interviewers are biased in their approach to different party leaders.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments