BBC put reputation at risk with severance deals, says Margaret Hodge
The Public Accounts Committee chair accused the corporation of ‘cronyism’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A senior BBC executive could be held in contempt of Parliament after a report by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) into huge pay-offs at the corporation suggested that witnesses may have misled MPs when they gave evidence.
Margaret Hodge, chair of the PAC, said the BBC had “put its reputation at risk” by handing over huge severance payments to senior staff.
Some of the justifications for the pay-offs had been “extraordinary”, said Mrs Hodge, who blamed a culture of “cronyism” that “allowed for the liberal use of other people’s money”.
The payments, totalling £25m handed out to 150 senior managers, included one to Deputy Director-General Mark Byford, who departed with a £949,000 settlement.
Mrs Hodge said the “dysfunctional relationship between the BBC Executive and BBC Trust”, revealed in the “unedifying disagreements between witnesses” at the hearing, “indicates that the governance model was broken”.
The report singled out the evidence of the BBC’s £320,000-a-year outgoing human resources boss Lucy Adams for particular criticism. The committee was “sceptical” when Ms Adams said she played no role in preparing a note on Mr Byford’s package. Ms Adams, who leaves the BBC next March, subsequently confirmed that she had been involved in the note.
The report said: “We remain concerned about the veracity of other parts of the oral evidence we heard. Misleading a select committee constitutes contempt of Parliament, which can have very serious consequences.” A spokesman for the committee said the panel would consider what further action to take. Penalties for contempt include prison but modern cases have been rare.
Mrs Hodge also accused the BBC Trust, the corporation’s governing body, of “sitting on its hands, failing to fulfil one of its primary duties”.
Mark Thompson, the former BBC Director-General, rejected the findings. He said the Byford package was approved by independent directors and was in “full compliance with all relevant financial and governance procedures and controls”.
A BBC spokesman said: “One of Tony Hall’s first acts on his appointment was to cap payments at £150,000 – the committee welcomed his decision.” Lucy Adams had “made it clear in her evidence to the committee that she did not attempt to mislead them, and while not immediately recognising a document that was being referred to, she clarified her position as soon as Parliament returned”.
A BBC Trust spokesman said: “We greatly regret that licence fee payers were let down by this episode. We will pursue the committee’s recommendation that the trust and executive record and communicate decisions properly so that audit concerns raised in the PAC report are addressed.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments