Toothpaste adverts broke rule on dentists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Three toothpaste adverts are criticised today for implying that dentists recommend their products for sensitive teeth.
The Advertising Standards Authority has told Colgate Palmolive and GlaxoSmithKline to amend commercials in light of its findings. It says adverts for Colgate Sensitive and Sensodyne toothpastes breach rules which ban the inclusion of dentists' recommendations for treatments, products or ingredients.
The Colgate commercial showed a woman explaining that her dentist suggested she try a "sensitive" toothpaste for her sensitive teeth, while a tube of Colgate Sensitive appeared on screen. Colgate Palmolive argued that the dentist had not directly endorsed or recommended a specific product.
GlaxoSmithKline is criticised for two adverts which appeared during the same commercial break.
The first showed a dentist stating patients with sensitive teeth could treat their problem by changing toothpaste, a second showing a woman complaining about her sensitive teeth followed by on-screen text asking: "What did her dentist recommend?" GlaxoSmithKline said the first commercial was a disease awareness campaign, and that viewers would not link the messages in the two adverts.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments