Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Shareholders query controls at 'Mirror'

Rachel Stevenson
Tuesday 18 May 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Trinity Mirror shareholders were yesterday demanding answers from the board over editorial controls at the Daily Mirror, with some claiming that the chief executive must share responsibility for printing pictures of Iraqi prisoners being abused by British soldiers that turned out to be hoaxes.

Trinity Mirror shareholders were yesterday demanding answers from the board over editorial controls at the Daily Mirror, with some claiming that the chief executive must share responsibility for printing pictures of Iraqi prisoners being abused by British soldiers that turned out to be hoaxes.

Deutsche Asset Management believes senior management must take some of the rap for the error, alongside the editor, Piers Morgan, who was sacked on Friday. The fund manager said the pictures were not just "signed off and put in the paper by the editor" but were also cleared by the chief executive, Sly Bailey. A spokesman said the decision to print the photographs was a "business decision" to boost circulation but that it was a "poor" one.

Shareholders also want a thorough investigation of what went wrong at the company in checking the veracity of the story, and who was involved in the decision to publish.

"The existence or not of suitable checks is a very important part of the preservation of shareholder value," Richard Singleton, head of corporate governance at Isis Asset Management, said yesterday.

"We want to hear more about whether the right checks were used but the system just went wrong; whether the checks were inadequate; or whether they just were ignored."

Some shareholders, however, have taken heart from Ms Bailey's decisive action in sacking Mr Morgan. Standard Life Investments, which has a 5 per cent stake in Trinity, yesterday said it had no concerns over her management of the company.

Tweedy Browne, the US investor, is also thought to be disgruntled that the Mirror brand is being damaged by the affair.

Mr Morgan is negotiating his severance package from Trinity after nearly nine years as editor of the newspaper, and is thought to be asking for between £1.5m and £2m.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in