Russians win the right to sue US magazine in Britain
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Two leading Russians have won the right to sue an American magazine in an English court, in a ruling that lawyers warn will turn Britain into the libel capital of the world.
Five law lords cleared the way yesterday for Boris Berezovsky, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Independent States, and Nikolai Glouchkov, managing director of Aeroflot, to bring proceedings against Forbes magazine in the UK.
Forbes accused both men of having been involved in criminal activity in Russia.
Yesterday Lord Steyn said: "In the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union, the transition of Russia from Communism to a market-orientated economy and society has been accompanied by a dramatic upsurge in organised crime and corruption." He said there had been "great interest" in these consequences of the "transformation of Russian society".
But on 19 December 1997 the court of first instance had ruled that Russia was the appropriate forum. This was overturned by the Court of Appeal in 1998. Lord Justice Hirst said that the action involved a "substantial complaint about English torts" and therefore granted "jurisdiction" to try the action in England. Yesterday the House of Lords rejected Forbes's claim that the case should be heard in the US or Russia. Libel lawyers warned the decision would open the floodgates to everyone who wanted to chance their luck on the "plaintiff friendly" libel lottery in Britain.
Defendants in the UK have the burden of proving the truth of the defamation. Libel payouts, although reduced recently are on a par with those in the US, where the "public figure defence" lets the media say almost anything about people in the public eye.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments