Quiz show contestant 'lost on purpose'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The BBC has denied that it cancelled an episode of its television quiz show Dog Eat Dog on Saturday because a contestant went against the ethos of the contest and unselfishly gave up a chance to win £10,000.
Rather than ruthlessly picking on each other's weaknesses, Tim Joyce, a fireman from Lincoln, and fellow contestants spent most of the programme being nice to each other. Then, in what a BBC source called an "extremely disappointing" undermining of the "spirit of the programme", Mr Joyce deliberately lost his lead to share his prize with his fellows.
One contestant said: "You would have to be a moron not to realise that the 'top dog' threw the game so that we would all go away with something. The final man – Tim Joyce – made sure the money was split between us by asking the remaining contestants questions he knew they could answer. We had all agreed beforehand that's what we'd do, no matter which of us came out on top."
The seven contestants were believed to have reached a pact during an activity day at a management centre last month before the show was recorded. The gruelling 24-hour session was supposed to expose each contestant's weaknesses to their competitors but, unfortunately for the producers of the programme, they got on rather well and agreed to share the £10,000 prize money. Each of the five winners would hand over £285 to the two losers so that everybody won.
A BBC spokeswoman denied that the show had been replaced by another episode because of the collusion. "It had been provisionally scheduled for this week but it is a regular practice to change the order of shows once they have been recorded. It will be shown in the next couple of weeks. If Mr Joyce has given up his opportunity to win £10,000 that was his choice."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments