Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sun editor criticises injunctions

 

Thursday 02 February 2012 14:54 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The editor of The Sun today criticised the use of privacy injunctions to protect people's reputations, even when stories were in the public interest.

Dominic Mohan told MPs and peers that a lot of injunctions had been "based on reputational damage rather than privacy".

Referring to the injunction obtained by disgraced banker Fred Goodwin to prevent reporting of his affair with a senior colleague at Royal Bank of Scotland, Mr Mohan said there had been a "clear public interest" in the story.

Mr Goodwin - who was stripped of his knighthood this week - was eventually named in the Commons, after which the allegations could be reported.

Appearing before Parliament's Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions, Mr Mohan said: "I felt in that case there was a clear public interest in publishing that story.

"He was the head of a large, failing bank, I think sexual behaviour can affect decision-making, it can affect judgment, and the RBS situation cost the taxpayer many, many millions of pounds.

"I think a lot of injunctions have been based on reputational damage rather than privacy."

He said judges had "not got the balance right" on privacy and needed to be "more in favour of freedom of expression".

On newspaper regulation, Mr Mohan insisted that Press Complaints Commission judgments were taken seriously within the industry.

"When an adjudication is made against a newspaper it's a badge of shame, and a number of those made in succession could raise questions about one's editorship," he said.

He suggested that newspapers could be incentivised to sign up to any new non-statutory system of regulation through advertising rates.

"There could be a way where newspapers that weren't kitemarked would be penalised in their advertising rates," he told the committee.

"They wouldn't be able to charge such high advertising rates and I think that could get some traction. If there was some penalty in that way you could see everybody joining up."

PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in