Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Nick Harris: What the 'News of the World' did not say

Monday 03 May 2010 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In the court of public opinion, John Higgins now has a huge question mark next to his reputation. In effect, the News of the World branded him a match-fixer. The report said he had "sensationally" agreed a "massive" bribe to "FIX matches" ( NoW's capitals).

Inside the paper, Higgins does apparently agree to lose four frames, one frame at each of four events, at an undisclosed point in the future. But the paper does not suggest Higgins has ever actually fixed a match or thrown a frame in his 18-year career. Nor does it say when he would. And that is one reason why awaiting the outcome of an investigation is to be advised before forming an opinion on his guilt or innocence.

This is not to say that Higgins, and especially his manager, Pat Mooney, were not naive at best, and possibly stupid, to put themselves in a position where they are discussing throwing frames for cash. That Mooney met reporters several times and talked about fixing is disturbing. He was right to resign from snooker's governing body, and his behaviour raises grave doubts over his suitability as Higgins's manager.

But there are grounds to suspect Higgins fell prey to an elaborate, expensive NoW set-up. If specifics were agreed, none of those details made it into print or into the edited video that the paper put on its website. The paper describes Higgins as "demanding a £300,000 kickback", although nothing in the report substantiates Higgins "demanding" anything.

A NoW reporter suggests the "fixing" would happen only in "exhibition matches". Losing a frame in an exhibition – where trick shots and stand-up comedy from players while performing are common – is an entirely different proposition to losing one at a tournament.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in