Murdoch junior is prepped for 'assault on credibility'
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
James Murdoch is being prepped by a litigation specialist to help explain why he failed to tell MPs of discussions he had with the News of the World editor on the "options" they faced over phone hacking.
The News International (NI) chairman appears today for the second time before the Commons Culture Committee, which includes Labour MP Tom Watson. Jeremy Sandelson, head of litigation for law firm Clifford Chance, has been tutoring James Murdoch to expect what one MP predicted would be "an assault on his credibility".
Key to the anticipated attack is a newly-published note of a 2008 conversation between NI's former solicitor, Julian Pike, and the last editor of the NOTW, Colin Myler.
During his last appearance before the committee, Mr Murdoch said a meeting on 10 June only concerned his approval of a confidential £725,000 payment to football union boss Gordon Taylor. He made no mention of the earlier meeting with Mr Myler.
He will have to account for the apparent contradictions in his account, which fails to mention discussing the views of a "silk" with Mr Myler – assumed to be Michael Silverleaf QC; that he "didn't believe" hacking had become a "culture" in the NOTW newsroom; and that an investigation into three newsdesk journalists at the tabloid had taken place.
The committee is also to focus on the written judgement given to NI by Mr Silverleaf before the 10 June, 2008 meeting. As chairman, James Murdoch would have been expected to know of the "overwhelming evidence" mentioned by the QC that more than one journalist was involved in "illegal inquiries".
Committee bingo: What's James likely to say to MPs this time?
He's facing another tough – and no doubt long – session before the Media Select Committee today. To liven things up if you're watching at home, give yourself a point if he uses any of these phrases:
Did not have direct knowledge
No recollection
Can you repeat?
Difficult for me to comment
Regret
Financial quantum
Not in a position to answer
Humble
Before I was involved
Happy to supply awritten answer
Co-operate fully
Matters for current criminal investigations
Not to my knowledge
Approval threshold
Procedural question
Due process
Transparency
If I can clarify
Documentary information
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.