Leveson Inquiry: Regulation of Stephen Fry's tweets mooted
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The editor of one of the world's most successful news websites today raised the prospect of Stephen Fry's Twitter page being regulated.
Martin Clarke, editor of the Daily Mail online, told the Leveson Inquiry into press standards that additional regulation may be a "dagger to the heart" of British online media.
Mr Clarke was talking about the difficulty of regulating web news publishers and bloggers with large audiences.
He said: "You can't slice and dice the internet up into different bits...Stephen Fry has four million followers on Twitter.
"He can reach more people in one hour than I can, so is he going to be regulated?"
The editor said a situation could not be allowed to exist where people could discuss matters on Twitter and Facebook but newspapers were not able to report them.
He said: "It would be very unpalatable for the newspapers or websites like the MailOnline to be placed under a heavier burden of regulation when the rest of the internet is not placed under any burden of regulation."
Mr Clarke also hit out at an uneven playing field for British media - hamstrung by being bound by European courts and different rules for foreign competitors who are all part of the English language global news market.
The editor cited two examples.
He said French celebrities were able to sue British media for photographs taken of them in America which did not breach UK laws or regulations.
He said the MailOnline was fighting one such legal bid.
Mr Clarke said: "It seems unreasonable for foreign nationals to try to export their own country's levels of privacy wherever they travel around the world."
He described the problems as giving "an inkling of the complexities" British journalists have to work under.
He added: "We don't find the current regulatory environment too disabling.
"There are occasions when it can be frustrating or irritating but that is not something that happens as a dagger to the heart of our business.
"But if things were significantly tightened then it may well do."
To make money, British online media have to succeed in America and other large English language markets.
Saying his main competitors were not traditional Fleet Street contemporaries but AOL, Yahoo and foreign news websites, he said British media had voluntarily agreed not to publish pictures of Pippa Middleton, the Duchess of Cambridge's sister, going about her daily business.
But American news groups published hundreds of pictures a day of her.
"It's a commercial disadvantage we just have to deal with," he said but added it was important the regulation does not become "any more skewed".
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments