Former boxer Chris Eubank promises 'gargantuan battle' over phone hacking
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Retired boxer Chris Eubank told the High Court today that he was looking forward to a “gargantuan battle” in the phone-hacking litigation.
The former world champion took the ring at the 14th case management conference before Mr Justice Vos in London to say that he was not accepting a “derisory offer” of £21,000 to settle his case.
Reading from notes in a room packed with around 100 lawyers and media, he said that the newspaper group had “made a mockery of the justice system here in the UK”.
Eubank persisted in holding the floor, despite interruptions by Dinah Rose QC, for News Group Newspapers, and the judge, who said that his resisted case was at a preliminary stage and it was not appropriate to try to negotiate in the face of the court.
Eubank persisted in saying that he was confident that evidence relating to his case would get in the public domain shortly and he looked forward to the “gargantuan battle” ahead of him.
“I know that Mrs Murdoch has a pretty good left hook so I am going to ask her to be gentle with me.”
The judge said that his case, which is currently stayed pending trial of other actions, would be dealt with as part of the managed litigation at the appropriate time and he would ask NGN to keep him informed.
Eubank persisted, saying he was not accepting the group's “derisory offer” as they had taken everything away from him.
He said he was fighting on, alleging they had destroyed his marriage and he had been unable to care for his children.
The judge persisted: “There is more than one man and more than one woman here fighting News International so if you will take your seat.”
Ms Rose objected to Eubank's comments about an offer but was told by the judge: “I tried to stop him grandstanding. What's done is done.”
PA
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments