David Cameron defends delays in press regulation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Press-regulation plans proposed by the industry have “serious shortcomings”, David Cameron said as he defended delays in pushing forward a Commons-backed version instead.
Victims of press intrusion wrote an open letter to the Culture Secretary, Maria Miller, urging her to press ahead with the implementation of a cross-party Royal Charter along the lines recommended by last year’s Leveson Inquiry into phone hacking.
Progress on the new system, agreed at a late-night meeting attended by members of the campaign group Hacked Off in March, has been delayed after newspapers submitted a rival charter and is not due to be considered by the Privy Council until the autumn.
Mr Cameron told MPs he had not changed his view on the issue and blamed procedural arrangements for the hold-up. “The legal advice… is that we have to take these things in order – we have to take the press’s Royal Charter first and then we have to bring forward the Royal Charter on which we have all agreed.
“I think the press’s Royal Charter has some serious shortcomings so no, I haven’t changed my view.”
The press’s plan would avoid any state underpinning for the new regulatory regime.
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments