Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Chinese newspaper that dared to speak out in front-page appeal for reporter’s release

Journalist queried business dealings of state-run company

Clifford Coonan
Thursday 24 October 2013 14:06 BST
Comments
‘Please release him’: yesterday’s ‘New Express’ newspaper
‘Please release him’: yesterday’s ‘New Express’ newspaper (AFP/Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A Chinese newspaper has made an unprecedented front-page appeal for the release of one of its journalists, as the government continues a crackdown on press freedom.

The state-run New Express tabloid ran a three-character headline on its front page saying “Please release him” and called on police in Changsha to set free reporter Chen Yongzhou.

Mr Chen was detained after writing a series of stories questioning the financial dealings of a major state-owned construction equipment maker, Zoomlion Heavy Industry Science and Technology.

The journalist was held for “damage to business reputation”.

China regularly targets journalists and bloggers for criticising the government. Rights group Reporters Without Borders recently added President Xi Jinping to a list of 39 leaders and groups identified as Predators of Freedom of Information in 2013.

New Express is one of China’s fiestier papers. It offers cash to readers who come up with stories and its aggression has been noted over the years.

An editorial to accompany the front-page piece said the newspaper had believed there would be no problem as long as it reported responsibly. “But the fact is, we are too naive. Chen Yongzhou had spent three days and three nights in jail before he saw a lawyer,” it added.The story was carried on Weibo, the Chinese version of Twitter, and also ran in Chinese mainstream media, without any obvious censorship.

“Even though Zoomlion is very strong and has paid a lot of taxes in Changsha, we are still class brethren, and there are contradictions here,” the commentary said. “We beg the police, our brothers, please let Chen Yongzhou go.”

Zoomlion said it had complained to the Changsha police about Mr Chen following his stories. “The reason we did it was to safeguard the legitimate rights of the company,” Zoomlion vice-president Sun Changjun told Reuters.

The newspaper said it had not made a statement about Mr Chen’s detention, which happened on 19 October, because they were worried he might be mistreated. “We are a small newspaper, but we have the backbone no matter how poor we are,” the New Express said.

Changsha’s Public Security Bureau said Chen was detained on suspicion of “damaging business reputation.”

The Chinese media is predominantly owned by the government and is kept on a tight leash, but the south of the country tends to be more ambitious in terms of calling for press freedom and Guangzhou, the capital of Guangdong province, has been more daring than others; the province adjoins Hong Kong, where media freedom is guaranteed.

In January, journalists at Southern Weekend, based in Guangzhou, protested after a propaganda official rewrote an editorial on political reform. The row sparked small protests from other media outlets.

It is possible that the criticism has been tolerated because it focuses on a regional, not a central, government organisation.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in