Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Palace anger at newspaper's three-year-old pictures of Harry

Cahal Milmo
Wednesday 16 August 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Sun was yesterday forced to defend its publication of a picture of Prince Harry fondling a woman in a nightclub after it emerged that the photograph was three years old.

The paper, which has scored several royal scoops based on embarrassing pictures of the Prince, said that the photograph of Harry kissing a blond friend with his hand on her breast had been taken this summer in a London nightspot, Boujis.

Clarence House said the photograph, accompanied by the headline "Dirty Harry", was taken in 2003 at another nightclub, Purple, in the basement of Chelsea Football Club. The nightclub has closed.

Royal aides pointed out that the age of the picture meant it had been taken before the 21-year-old prince met his current girlfriend, Chelsy Davy. The Sun had said that Ms Davy was not in the picture because she was abroad.

A spokesman for Clarence House said: "We have contacted The Sun and asked them to make a correction."

Aides added that the photograph had not been printed with the permission of its owner, Natalie Pinkham, a presenter for a poker television channel and the friend pictured with Harry.

The Sun said it was re-examining its claims for where and when the photographs were taken.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in