21st Century Fox’s $80bn (£48bn) proposal to buy Time Warner -has Murdoch lost his Midas touch?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Once the ultimate dealmaker, Rupert Murdoch is licking his wounds after the rebuttal of 21st Century Fox’s $80bn (£48bn) proposal to buy Time Warner.
Mr Murdoch said the refusal of Time Warner to engage in discussions, coupled with the negative reaction of Fox’s share price, made the transaction, which would have created a new global media behemoth, “no longer attractive to Fox shareholders”.
Fox is now looking inwards with Mr Murdoch’s board adding another $6bn to the company’s stock buy-back programme.
While Fox reported an almost 17 per cent rise in quarterly revenue last week, News Corp, the publishing arm of Mr Murdoch’s business, which includes The Sun and The Times, continues to pose problems.
Tulisa Contostavlos, the former X-Factor presenter who was cleared of drugs charges following a cocaine sting by The Sun’s Fake Sheikh Mazher Mahmood, plans to sue News Corp in the US over the affair.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments