OK! to pay Hello! over circulation claims
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Hello! Magazine today claimed victory in its legal battle with OK! magazine over circulation figures.
Hello! Magazine today claimed victory in its legal battle with OK! magazine over circulation figures.
Northern and Shell, publisher of OK!, has agreed not to publish any further claims that OK! circulation figures have overtaken those of Hello!
OK! has also agreed to pay Hello! £150,000 in damages and costs to settle a claim for malicious falsehood.
A spokesman for Hello! said the action was to have gone to the High Court but OK! agreed to all its demands and had "caved in", according to the trial judge, Mr Justice Hart.
"Hello! intends to donate damages won to the NSPCC's Full Stop Campaign, a charity for which it has pledged to raise £1 million."
The spokesman said Hello! issued proceedings for malicious falsehood and infringement of trademark last year after OK! distributed "false sales figures" for Hello! to advertisers and journalists.
After OK! agreed to settlement terms, Sally Cartwright of Hello! said: "We are delighted with this result. Clearly Northern and Shell knew it could not defend its action and as a result has completely capitulated a matter of hours before the matter was due to go to court.
"The activities of OK! demanded a strong response and we were left with no choice but to protect the company and the standards of behaviour expected in this industry through the courts."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments