Princess Diana: Martin Bashir responds to inquiry, admitting regret over fake bank statements
‘She led the way in addressing so many of these issues and that’s why I will always remain immensely proud of that interview’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Martin Bashir has said he “deeply regrets” his decision to use fake bank statements to secure and interview with Princess Diana in 1995.
A report into the journalist’s interview with the Princess of Wales released on Thursday came to the conclusion the way in which the interview was arranged was “deceitful.”
It was discovered that Mr Bashir, 58, had faked documents to obtain the 1995 interview with the princess. He then lied to BBC managers about these, the investigation reported.
An inquiry, led by retired judge Lord Dyson, said that the BBC “fell short of the high standards of integrity and transparency which are its hallmark.”
In a statement responding to the report’s findings, Mr Bashir said: “This is the second time that I have willingly fully cooperated with an investigation into events more than 25 years ago. I apologised then, and I do so again now, over the fact that I asked for bank statements to be mocked up. It was a stupid thing to do and was an action I deeply regret. But I absolutely stand by the evidence I gave a quarter of a century ago, and again more recently.
“I also reiterate that the bank statements had no bearing whatsoever on the personal choice by Princess Diana to take part in the interview. Evidence handed to the inquiry in her own handwriting (and published alongside the report today) unequivocally confirms this, and other compelling evidence presented to Lord Dyson reinforces it. In fact, despite his other findings, Lord Dyson himself in any event accepts that the princess would probably have agreed to be interviewed without what he describes as my ‘intervention’.
“It is saddening that this single issue has been allowed to overshadow the princess’ brave decision to tell her story, to courageously talk through the difficulties she faced, and, to help address the silence and stigma that surrounded mental health issues all those years ago. She led the way in addressing so many of these issues and that’s why I will always remain immensely proud of that interview.”
A Panorama investigation into the interview will be shown at 7pm on Thursday on BBC One.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments