Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

M&S risks war with Daily Mail by pulling its advertising

Susie Mesure
Friday 04 March 2005 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Marks & Spencer has risked jeopardising its recovery by withdrawing all of its advertising from the Daily Mail and its sister titles in an attempt to punish the newspaper for a misleading article.

The retailer, which is in the middle of its biggest marketing drive for years, pulled all of its adverts from Associated Newspapers' four main titles, including the Evening Standard and Metro. The move was sparked by an article last November in the Mail on Sunday , which claimed the group's new management team, led by Stuart Rose, wanted to sell up to half of its Simply Food convenience store chain.

The company denied the report, which suggested it would have to write off millions of pounds on any deal. But it is understood to have been unhappy with the correction. Industry observers said M&S took a big gamble in opting to withdraw its advertisements from the Associated titles, which are read by the core clientele it needs to lure back. It withdrew the ads in January, missing out on the chance to reach up to five million readers.

After a dire Christmas, M&S was forced to bring forward its January trading statement and issue a profit warning. Mr Rose is under increasing pressure to halt the group's deteriorating performance, which saw its like-for-like sales sink 5.6 per cent in the six weeks to 1 January. Underlying sales across the group have fallen for five straight quarters.

It is not the first time that a company has sought to punish a newspaper for adverse copy by pulling its advertising. Two years ago, MG Rover dropped its advertising from all the Express Newspaper titles after a disagreement over editorial.

Businesses also sometimes punish newspapers for their political views. Jardine Matheson, the conglomerate, withdrewadvertising from the Financial Times for a year after it endorsed the Labour Party in 1992.

M&S and Associated declined to comment yesterday.

Insiders at Associated said the stand-off was unlikely to last long. Although M&S is a significant source of advertising revenues, it is not among the Daily Mail's biggest retail clients. The newspaper relies most heavily on Dixons, whose Linda Barker-fronted campaigns often take up an entire double-page spread.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in