Lucky the lost dog ads 'caused distress'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An advertising campaign that bombarded Britain with posters appealing for help to find a lost dog called Lucky has been condemned by industry regulators for exploiting public concern over animal welfare.
The Advertising Standards Authority has censured the Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Group advertisements for causing distress to people who thought they were genuine.
Adopting the style of a dog owner's attempt to find a lost pet with a poster asking "Where's Lucky?", the campaign prompted a flurry of interest in the fate of the missing Airedale-collie cross. After several weeks of teasing the nation, the posters were revealed as a ploy to promote a financial product.
In its defence, the insurance company argued that it was obvious to consumers that the appeal was not genuine and that research carried out before the campaign launch had shown that the public was fully able to understand that it was a spoof.
The posters included a telephone number and a website address, which provided information on Battersea Dogs' Home in London, which had been consulted in advance, and advised callers to contact local authorities if they found a stray.
But the ASA ruling, published today, asks Royal and Sun Alliance to avoid repeating the advertisements.
The authority acknowledged people would understand the advertisement once they had dialled the telephone number or accessed the website, but considered distress could have been caused none the less.
There were 15 complaints from members of the public who thought the campaign could undermine genuine attempts to find lost pets.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments