Kilroy: I blame my secretary, the BBC, sub-editors...
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Accusation and counter-accusation were flying thick and fast last night in the controversy over Robert Kilroy-Silk's comments on Arabs. In the past 24 hours, the TV presenter has blamed his secretary, the BBC, the "forces of political correctness" and the Sunday Express.
The newspaper, meanwhile, blamed the BBC, and some sources at the paper blamed Kilroy himself. If the arguments in his television studio had been this good, his programme would have been compulsory viewing.
At the centre of it all was his column last Sunday in which he described Arabs as "suicide bombers, limb-amputators, women repressers". This led to him being reported to the police for incitement to racial hatred and his show being suspended by the BBC.
Complicating matters was the fact that this column was an inadvertent repeat of one published last April. And clouding things even further was the fact that the earlier column referred to "Arab countries", while the 2004 version used the ethnic term "Arabs".
Last night, in early editions of the Sunday Express, Kilroy said his secretary sent the wrong email attachment, and he insisted that his remarks had not caused offence when they were first published in April last year. However, a senior source at the paper claimed that, far from removing the word "countries" in the second article, editors had added it to the first one to "make it less inflammatory".
The truth was unclear, and, just for good measure, Kilroy-Silk took the opportunity in today's paper to invoke the Second World War and the memory of his late father, who died defending the "rights to freedom".
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments