Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

History man Starkey in 'golden handcuffs' deal

Sarah Cassidy,Education Correspondent
Friday 15 February 2002 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Channel 4 is poised to sign an exclusive "golden handcuffs" deal with the historian and presenter David Starkey to stop him being poached by rival broadcasters.

Dr Starkey, once called the rudest man in Britain, has fronted some of Channel 4's most successful factual programmes, helping to rescue history from television's graveyard slots and make it a genre attracting higher ratings than Friends and Brookside.

The terms of the multimillion-pound deal between Granada, which produces the programmes, and Channel 4 are still being discussed but the deal will see the academic attempt to recreate the spectacular success of Elizabeth and The Six Wives of Henry VIII, which attracted more than four million viewers.

Under the deal, Dr Starkey, who has been described as having "all the cosy TV charm of a hyena" and was called "the rudest man in Britain" by the Daily Mail, will front 25 hours of history programmes over four years.

Since the surprise success of his four-part series on Elizabeth I, history has enjoyed a surge in popularity, becoming the most popular subject among documentary-makers.

On BBC 2, Simon Schama's History of Britain in 2000 was one of the channel's biggest successes, commanding enormous ratings, while the launch of the channel's series on the Civil War was accompanied by an unprecedented level of hype.

Both Channel 4 and BBC2 have attempted to capitalise on the public's enthusiasm for all things historical by pledging to increase history production by around a third.

Andy Harries, controller of comedy and drama at Granada, told last year's Montreux television festival: "History is the new gardening," and told viewers to expect even more history programmes.

Yesterday the terms of Dr Starkey's new contract were being hammered out by Jim Allen, Granada's controller of factual programmes, and Janice Hadlow, Channel 4's head of history. A spokesman for Channel 4 said that the subjects of his new programmes could not be confirmed until the contract was signed.

The deal is a mark of the value Dr Starkey commands as a proven success as a historical presenter. However, some commentators have criticised the new-style documentaries as being too dependent on the personality of presenters such as Dr Starkey and Professor Schama.

Tristram Hunt, the young academic nicknamed "the naked historian" for his BBC2 series on the English Civil War, even entered the fray with a much-publicised spat with Dr Starkey. Dr Hunt, 27, described Dr Starkey's programmes as the work of a "gossip columnist", arguing "there is far more to history than who shagged whom".

Dr Starkey said Dr Hunt had a "chip on his shoulder" and accused the BBC of trading on his rival's youthful good looks. The BBC hopes that Dr Hunt will draw a younger audience.

Dr Gillian Evans, a Cambridge historian, said the personality cult of historians could impede the viewers' understanding of the story being told. "The question is whether TV documentaries are providing entertainment or helping people to get inside the mind of an earlier age. There is a tendency to front such things with 'the glamorous historian' or 'the dotty but endearing academic' so that a personality cult gets between the viewer and the story."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in