Composers say 'coercive' deals are cutting TV pay
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Composers who write music for television programmes are taking Britain's broadcasters to the Office of Fair Trading in a dispute over contracts they claim are destroying their potential incomes.
Composers who write music for television programmes are taking Britain's broadcasters to the Office of Fair Trading in a dispute over contracts they claim are destroying their potential incomes.
Television firms pay composers a fee for theme tunes and other incidental music. But often the most valuable source of income is royalties paid when the music is performed or broadcast in another context.
The British Academy of Composers and Songwriters says broadcasters are increasingly offering commissions only if the composer signs over most of these other royalties, cutting incomes by as much as 35 per cent.
It claims the practice, known as "coercion", is used by all the major broadcasters and is anti-competitive.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments