Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Channel 4 censured for 'Big Brother' scuffle

Terri Judd
Tuesday 19 October 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Channel 4 was reprimanded by the regulator yesterday after it was accused of engineering a physical confrontation on Big Brother to boost ratings.

Since its inception, Big Brother has been dogged by accusations of cynical exploitation and cheap sensationalism and yesterday Ofcom added its voice to critics of the ratings winner. The media regulator criticised Channel 4 for not acting swiftly enough to stop violence between contestants on the fifth series, billed in pre-publicity as Big Brother gets evil.

Ofcom said it had received 328 complaints from viewers about a row which began after Emma Greenwood and Michelle Bass returned to the house from a secret bedsit, to the annoyance of housemates Jason Cowan and Victor Ebuwa. Police were called and security guards had to separate the contestants.

Ofcom ruled that Big Brother , produced by Endemol, breached the programme code with its live footage on E4, upholding 55 complaints. It dismissed 190 complaints about the Channel 4 highlights and a further 83 complaints about the participants' well-being.

Viewers, some of whom were so frightened they called the police, complained that the show's producers did not intervene swiftly enough, waiting 20 minutes to bring in security. They accused Channel 4 of engineering the alcohol-fuelled confrontation, which developed in the early hours of 17 June and provided a huge boost to ratings.

They complained that the footage was distressing and exploitative. During some scenes, the cameras cut to the garden but viewers could hear what was going on.

Ofcom said: "The apparent absence of intervention by Channel 4 to prevent the situation escalating to this point, having 'engineered' the situation originally, clearly caused distress and offence to viewers ...the intensity and repetition of verbal and physical violence exceeded viewers' expectations."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in