BBC reprimands Humphrys over pushy interview
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The BBC has reprimanded veteran journalist John Humphrys after the Secretary General of Nato complained about constant interruptions during an interview, it emerged today.
The BBC has reprimanded veteran journalist John Humphrys after the Secretary General of Nato complained about constant interruptions during an interview, it emerged today.
The corporation upheld a complaint by Lord Robertson of Portellen, the former Defence Secretary, after an appearance on Radio 4's Today programme.
BBC governors found Humphrys' approach had been "inappropriate" and "ill-judged".
Lord Robertson had said Humphrys, famous for his no-nonsense questioning style, had "not met proper BBC standards".
Humphrys had used the interview about Kosovo as a "platform for his own opinions", it was claimed, while his interjections amounted to a "critical running commentary".
As a result of the complaint the editor of the Today programme, Rod Liddle, had spoken to Humphrys about the handling of the interview.
He made it clear that he expected a different approach should be adopted when the subject was next covered, the BBC said.
The BBC Board of Governors gave its findings on the incident in February in its programme complaints bulletin.
The report said: "Although the premises of Mr Humphrys' questions referred to views expressed by others rather than opinions of his own, the tone of the questioning was inappropriate at times and the frequency of the interruption was ill-judged."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments