Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

BBC reprimands DJ Sara Cox for backing Kerry in presidential race

Ciar Byrne Media Correspondent
Wednesday 28 April 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The radio 1 DJ Sara Cox has been chastised by the BBC for breaking its rules on impartiality by expressing support on her show for the United States presidential candidate Senator John Kerry.

A listener complained after Cox endorsed comments by Chris Martin, the lead singer of the rock band Coldplay, who voiced his support for Mr Kerry at the Grammy awards in February. In its quarterly bulletin, the BBC's programme complaints unit said: "In unscripted comments intended to express enthusiasm for a British success ... Sara Cox went beyond reporting Chris Martin's remarks and, in effect, endorsed them."

The radio station's management reminded Cox, who recently swapped the Radio 1 breakfast show for Chris Moyles's afternoon "drive time" slot, of "the importance of maintaining due impartiality on controversial matters".

Mark Byford, the BBC's acting director general, said it had missed its target for responding to complaints. Between January and March, the unit received 363 complaints, but only responded to 28 per cent of these within its target period of 20 days. In the past year only 35.5 per cent of complaints received replies within the allotted time. Mr Byford said: "It reflects the difficulties the unit has been working under."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in