Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Welfare-to-work firm is ordered to revise advert

Josie Clarke
Tuesday 21 August 2012 22:21 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A claim by welfare-to-work business A4e that it is a "social purpose company" has been banned for potentially misleading consumers into thinking it is a not-for-profit organisation.

The company, which faced allegations of fraud in relation to government contracts, claimed on the website mya4e.com: "A4e is a social purpose company with one sole aim. To improve people's lives around the world. We do this by helping them find work, skills, direction – whatever they need." One person complained that the "social purpose" claim was likely to mislead consumers as to the nature of the business because it intended to generate a profit.

Defending the claim, A4e said the focus of its business activities was to "achieve positive social outcomes".

But the Advertising Standards Authority said it was concerned that readers would interpret the claim to mean that A4e was a not-for-profit organisation.

It ruled that the ad must not appear again in its current form and told A4e to ensure claims were not likely to mislead in future.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in