Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain may be forced to lift its ban on political advertising when the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) rules on its lawfulness tomorrow.
The issue came to court after the campaign group Animal Defenders International (ADI) was told it could not run adverts highlighting the plight of caged primates. Because the organisation was not a charity, it was treated as a political group. ADI said this was a breach of its right to freedom of expression and appealed against the decision. The final ruling in its attempts to overturn the ban on its adverts will be handed down tomorrow.
If ADI is successful, the Government will have to amend the laws regarding political advertising or even lift the ban altogether, allowing all groups and parties to campaign on the airwaves.
The ECHR has overturned similar bans in Norway and Switzerland. Jacob Rowbottom, a fellow in constitutional law at University College, Oxford, said: "It seems very likely that they will find the complete blanket ban on paid political advertising to violate [freedom of expression]."
The Tory MP George Eustice, who has called for changes in the political broadcast systems, said: "We do have some of the most draconian restrictions on broadcast political advertising in the free world. It shouldn't be beyond the wit of man to improve the situation beyond what it is now but also maintain safeguards so that you didn't have a system where cheque books buy access to the broadcast medium."
A spokesperson from the Department of Culture, Media and Sport maintained that the ban was necessary: "The ban has wide support and has helped sustain the balance of views which is at the heart of British broadcasting – and ensures that advertising broadcast into our homes is not determined by those who have the deepest pockets."
The former solicitor general Sir Edward Garnier agreed: "We would be uncomfortable in England filling up our screens with aggressive political campaign advertising. You could say it's a restriction of free speech, but it's one the British are prepared to tolerate to keep political advertising off their screens."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments