Sainsbury's ad campaign ruled misleading by ASA
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sainsbury's has been ordered to change its “brand match” campaign after the advertising watchdog found it was misleading consumers.
The television, radio, internet and newspaper campaign promised customers would not pay more for brands than at Asda or Tesco, with the supermarket giant giving a voucher if prices were found to be cheaper at either of its two rivals.
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received 20 complaints, from Tesco and 19 members of the public, that the coupon would in some cases confirm that customers would have paid less for branded goods at the two other chains.
Some complained that the ads did not make it clear that any saving was calculated across all of the brands in a shopper's basket or that the offer was only available to those who spent £20 or more.
Sainsbury's said it strongly believed that the brand match was a "genuine, clear and concise offer" that relied on a simple process.
The supermarket said the offer was straightforward for consumers and had been well received, with nearly 100 million coupons issued, indicating that shoppers understood the deal from the advertising.
The ASA noted that consumers would need to make a further purchase in order to redeem the coupons, which were limited to a value of £10 and had to be redeemed within two weeks.
It also understood that prices were only matched rather than bettered, and that consumers would in some instances pay more in order to receive the coupon for the difference.
The ASA ruled that the ads must not appear again in their current form and added: "We told Sainsbury's to ensure future ads did not imply consumers would not pay more, or would save money, if that was not the case.
"We also told them to ensure all significant conditions of promotions were made clear in future."
Sainsbury's said: "Sainsbury's is committed to providing advertising that our customers can easily understand. We do not believe that our customers have been misled but we have already changed our current advertising to reflect the concerns raised."
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments