Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hovis 'scary Mary' advert complaints rejected

Pa
Wednesday 20 October 2010 11:46 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

An ad for Hovis bread has escaped a ban despite complaints that it condoned anti-social behaviour and bullying, a watchdog said today.

The TV campaign for Hovis Hearty Oats bread showed a teenage girl riding a bicycle along a school corridor, hitting a school boy who called her "scary Mary" over the head with a notebook, making a prank phone call, throwing flour in a cookery class, pushing a teacher into a swimming pool and holding a piece of bread above a dog as it jumps up and down to try to reach it.

Four people complained that the ads were irresponsible and condoned anti-social behaviour and bullying, with one suggesting the scene with the dog was cruel and could encourage harmful emulation.

Hovis producer Premier Foods said the aim of the ads was to portray a confident but high-spirited girl's mischievous antics during her childhood in the 1970s in contrast with the sensible choices she made as an adult.

It did not agree the ads as a whole encouraged or condoned bullying, violence or cruelty or could lead to physical harm to children.

Rejecting the complaints, the Advertising Standards Authority said: "Although we noted some of the girl's actions were mischievous and naughty, they were not without consequence, and she was reprimanded in several scenes."

It added that the scene with the dog was restricted for broadcast when it was not likely to be seen by children.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in