Asda's Christmas advert featuring mother almost single-handedly carrying out preparations ruled 'not sexist' after complaints
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Asda's Christmas advert featuring a mother who appeared to be almost single-handedly carrying out the preparations has been cleared following more than 600 complaints that it was offensive and sexist.
The supermarket giant's major Christmas campaign showed the mother buying the tree, writing cards, buying groceries, decorating her home, wrapping presents and cooking the Christmas dinner, with a voice-over at the end saying: "It doesn't just happen by magic. Behind every great Christmas there's mum, and behind mum there's Asda."
The majority of the 620 complainants objected that the ad was offensive and sexist because it reinforced outdated stereotypes of men and women in the home.
A number objected that it was likely to cause serious offence to single fathers or to men who played a primary domestic role and some others believed it was offensive and distressing to children or families who had lost mothers.
Defending the campaign, Asda said a survey of 1,896 customers who were mothers found around eight in 10 were responsible for the food and present shopping and wrapping the presents, adding that it intended to portray a scene which reflected the Christmas experience of the majority of its shoppers.
It also pointed out that the father played a positive role by helping with preparations, hosting the family and looking after the children.
ITV, which screened the ad, argued that it depicted a broadly positive stereotypical depiction of the role of mothers at Christmas, adding that "in general, stereotypical portrayals were inevitably based on truisms".
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said viewers were likely to understand that the ad was attempting to reflect the Christmas experience of a significant number of its customers rather than a prescriptive view.
It said: "We therefore considered the ad was not likely to be seen as condoning or encouraging harmful discriminatory behaviour or reinforcing negative stereotypes of men or women in general and, for those reasons, considered it was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence."
While it acknowledged that single fathers and men with primary domestic responsibilities might find the presentation of the mother playing the central role "distasteful", it also noted that the ad showed the father assisting in the Christmas preparations, concluding that: "We therefore considered the ad was not likely to cause serious offence to single fathers or to men who played a primary domestic role and concluded that the ad did not breach the Code."
The ASA also said that while the theme of the ad might upset some people, including children, who had lost mothers, it was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence or distress to those viewers.
PA
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments