`Matey' charter irks Australia
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.EXTOLLING THE values of "fairness", "independence" and "mateship", Australia's Prime Minister, John Howard, released a draft for a new constitutional preamble.
The Liberal-National government says it wants public comment on the draft before putting it to the people in conjunction with a referendum on becoming a republic.
Describing Australia as a nation "woven together of people from many ancestries and arrivals", it says: "Since time immemorial our land has been inhabited by Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders, who are honoured for their ancient and continuing cultures."
Mr Howard wrote the preamble with the help of the poet Les Murray, a defender of outback values. "Australians are free to be proud of their country and heritage," it says. "We value excellence as well as fairness, independence as dearly as mateship."
But the document, released yesterday, has been criticised as badly written, sexist and unacceptable to Aboriginals.
The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission chairman, Gatjil Djerrkura, criticising the reference to Aborigines, said it was always clear that Mr Howard had no plans to recognise indigenous Australians as custodians of the land rather than as "inhabitants".
Women's groups objected to the use of the word "mateship" as "coded masculine" and not representative of the contribution of women to the nation. Critics have also complained that the preamble is badly written, describing it as corny in parts.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments