Mass trial 'a pantomime'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A MASS trial of Algerian terrorist suspects began in a converted gymnasium near Paris yesterday amid allegations of legal pantomime, judicial megalomania and political interference.
No fewer than 138 defendants accused of plotting or abetting terrorist attacks will appear in the pounds 1m makeshift court. They will be joined by 120 lawyers and 300 police in what is believed to be the largest and most unwieldy trial in France for 50 years. Reading the names of the defendants and the charges took two hours and 45 minutes yesterday.
Most of the defence lawyers walked out last night after failing to halt proceedings. They said it would be impossible for any individual to receive a fair hearing in such circumstances. One lawyer compared the event to a political show-trial worthy of China or the Soviet Union. The judges were unmoved. The defence advocates are expected to return today.
The trial was beset by controversy before it began. Civil- rights watchdogs complained about anti-terrorist laws that allowed 24 of the defendants to be held on provisional charges, without trial, for four years. Local politicians protested at the cost of converting the gym at Fleury-Merogis, 20 miles south of Paris.
Defence lawyers, civil-rights activists and newspapers have questioned the motives of the principal investigating judge, France's terrorist-buster- in-chief, Jean-Louis Bruguiere. It was he who insisted on the epic nature of the trial, hauling in scores of people on vague charges of "association with wrong-doers". Many, say defence lawyers, are no more than relatives or acquaintances of the main suspects.
One lawyer, Philippe Petillaud, said proceedings had been rendered absurd by "certain megalomanic judges." Le Monde said the politically influential Mr Bruguiere's hunger for publicity had overriden the objections of other public officials and trampled the natural conditions of justice.
The trial arises from police raids in 1994 and 1995 which, it is alleged, dismantled an Islamist terrorist network that planned to attack civilian targets in France. It is claimed the network was led by Mohamed Chalabi, 43, previously known to police only as a small-time criminal. When it was the turn of Mr Chalabi's name to be called yesterday, he refused to answer to the description "Algerian". He said he was of "Muslim nationality".
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments