Lords Reform: Victories for Tories in Lords reform averted by Irvine
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOVERNMENT suffered two setbacks last night over its plans for reform of the House of Lords.
By 231 to 189 votes, peers
voted to insist that the indepedent appointments commission
to vet the future choice of members most be put on a statuary basis to prevent any dangers of patronage by this or any future
governments.
Earlier, Lord Irvine of Lairg, the Lord Chancellor, had caved in to demands for "by-elections" to replace any of the 92 hereditaries remaining in the transitional upper chamber who die before stage two of the reform process is implemented. The so-called Weatherill deal to retain 92 hereditaries during the interim stage of reform was accepted by the Government last month.
Lord Irvine said that ministers would agree to the by-elections as long as only those hereditaries who were still working peers were allowed to vote to fill any vacancies.
It means that more than 600 hereditary peers, who will not be taking part in the second chamber's proceedings once the House of Lords Bill becomes law, may be able to stand for election.
In tabling the amendment, the Tories, led by Lord Strathclyde, said the amendment was a "necessary safeguard" which had "logic and certainty".
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments