Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lord Archer asked journalist `to forget their conversation'

Kim Sengupta
Friday 26 November 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

LORD ARCHER'S dinner on the evening of 9 September 1986 has proved to be his costliest ever. What happened at the Sambuca, a small bistro near Sloane Square, in fashionable south west London, has destroyed his dreams of a political career and left him with the real prospect of prosecution and a prison sentence for alleged conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

It was the revelation last weekend by his former friend Ted Francis that Lord Archer had asked him to falsely say he was at the meal, which led to the peer pulling out of the contest to be the mayor of London in ignominy. Now the latest allegations by Adam Raphael, a distinguished journalist, about the same dinner, at the same restaurant, have heaped more trouble upon the author.

Mr Raphael's claims go further. In an article in The Economist magazine, Mr Raphael says that Lord Archer, then deputy chairman of the Toryparty, asked him to "forget" a conversation that would have major bearing in the court case the peer was facing. When Mr Raphael refused, Lord Archer is alleged to have perjured himself in the witness box.

Lord Archer had been accused by the Daily Star newspaper of sleeping with a prostitute, Monica Coghlan. The newspaper claimed, at first, that it happened on the night of 9 September 1986. Itlater changed that to the previous evening, the 8th.

But before this happened, Lord Archer had been busy getting himself an alibi for the 9th. He asked Mr Francis to lie and say he was dining with him at the Sambuca that night. When this deception unravelled last weekend, the peer claimed he had been trying to protect his real dining companion, a woman, from unwelcome publicity. He steered the media towards Andrina Colquhon, his former personal assistant. It was suggested that the reason for his apprehension was that he had promised his wife Mary that he was no longer seeing Ms Colquhon, and promised Margaret Thatcher that she had no reason to fear any embarrassing publicity emanating from him.

Mr Raphael has discovered that Lord Archer's office diary stated he was dining with Terence Baker, a theatrical agent. This was potentially a far more dangerous scenario for Lord Archer if it ever came out. Mr Baker was his key alibi for the night of the 8th and testified in court that Lord Archer had been with him at the Le Caprice restaurant and then driven him back to his home in Camberwell, South London, when the Daily Star claimed he was seeing Monica Coghlan. Mr Baker's version of events was accepted by the jury and Lord Archer went on to receive pounds 500,000 in damages as well as pounds 700,000 in costs. Mr Baker died in 1991.

Mr Raphael's other extremely damaging claim is that Lord Archer asked him to forget a conversation which was potentially extremely helpful to the Daily Star's case. The journalist, then with The Observer, and a colleague, Rupert Morris, of the now defunct Sunday Today newspaper, both say they had been told by Lord Archer that he had met Monica or "Debbie" Coghlan "casually" six months previously.

Mr Raphael refused, and went on to be a witness for the Daily Star. He also gave a detailed account of the conversation with Lord Archer to the Observer's then in-house lawyer, Julia Braybrook.

Mr Raphael also claims that Lord Archer had in effect prepared an "A- list" and "B-list" of alibi witnesses for the 8th and the 9th, something the jury were not told. Mr Raphael's allegations not only raise more questions about Lord Archer's veracity, and the judgement of William Hague in backing him as the Tories' mayoral candidate - detectives from Scotland Yard, who are already investigating the peer, are also, it is believed, taking a keen interest in the latest claims.

THE ARCHER QUESTION

Q. What exactly are Lord Archer's academic qualifications?

A. Jeffrey Archer had left school in 1958 with three O-levels. Yet when he became a master at Dover College in 1961, it was clearly thought he had A-levels and a university degree, he even wore a university gown in the school photograph with BSc, next to his name. Oxford University received a letter from Dover College saying he had three A-levels and a degree from the University of California. Without this Lord Archer would never have got on to its education course. He claims this was all a misunderstanding. When challenged about the false CV by David Frost on television, Lord Archer denied any knowledge of them. He has always said he had no idea who could have supplied his false academic credentials.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in