Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

LLOYD'S 'NAME' LOSES OUT FOR A SECOND TIME

Steve Boggan
Thursday 02 March 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

BY STEVE BOGGAN

Heard the one about the man who lost a packet at Lloyd's so put his money where it would be safe ... Barings?

No, it is not a joke, but it could be the archetypal investment story of the Nineties. Michael Stearn, 50, deposited enough money at Barings to enable him to continue underwriting after three successive losing years in the insurance market, but discovered this week that all the cash has been frozen.

He is one of a growing number of individuals, charities, pension funds and corporations waiting to find out if their assets will ever be recovered following the disastrous collapse of Barings on Sunday.

Potential new victims to come forward yesterday included the London Transport pension fund, which could lose up to £20m.

Mr Stearn's problems began when administrators Ernst & Young froze the assets of Baring Brothers & Co, the banking arm of the group. "I had deposited a large sum of money so that Barings could issue a bank guarantee to Lloyd's so I could continue trading as a `name'," he said yesterday.

"But now I'm told it has been frozen. I simply can't believe my bad luck. I have lost money at Lloyd's for three years running - and now this happens. "

Mr Stearn, a marketing consultant from Woking, Surrey, will not say how much he deposited at Barings, nor how much he lost at Lloyd's.

However, Lloyd's `names' must have £250,000 in unencumbered assets to be called upon in the event of a loss. And the last three sets of results at Lloyd's, totalling deficits of £6.4bn, mean that most members have faced losses running into six figures.

"I just think that people ought to know that when they go into a bank to deposit some money ... some young trader in Singapore can gamble it away on something called derivatives," he said. "I got involved with the City's two blue chip institutions and my experiences show that no one is safe."

A spokesman for Ernst & Young said cash deposits were unlikely to be returned.

However, could it be that, since Barings issued Mr Stearn's guarantee, it would be responsible in the event of a call on his assets?

"No," said a Lloyd's spokesman. "If his guarantee is frozen, we reserve the right to go for his other assets ..."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in