Liberal Democrat Conference: Education - Party defeats Ashdown on school trusts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PADDY ASHDOWN suffered an embarrassing defeat yesterday when party activists overwhelmingly voted against key proposals to shift power over schools to parents from local councillors, many of whom are Liberal Democrats.
But immediately after the defeat, Mr Ashdown vowed to continue to press for the controversial introduction of Neighbourhood School Trusts, which would consist of community-based groups such as parish councils.
As part of his campaign to change the education structure, he has asked Liverpool city council, which has a Liberal Democrat majority, to set up the independent trusts on a trial basis.
"The vote was disappointing. But we are determined to take this forward and we stand by the broad principle with a longer campaign of consultation," he said.
Don Foster, the Liberal Democrat education spokesman who drew up the proposals, said the policy was "far from dead".
"The underpinning principles of the trusts are the underpinning principles of Liberal Democracy and they are principles I have campaigned for my whole political life," Mr Foster said.
Under the scheme, councils would sign contracts with the new trusts to run schools according to specified standards and would take on a monitoring role.
Jackie Ballard, a member of the party's local government team, welcomed the vote, warning that the plans would diminish the role of local authorities, an area where Liberal Democrat representation is the strongest.
Summing up the debate, Mr Foster told the conference that the trusts would offer communities the opportunity to get involved in education in their area at a time when the present system was failing.
"Some people have been saying that the trusts would be opting out all over again. Well it is not," he said.
"We want local authorities to set out what each and every citizen should be entitled to expect from the education service. Communities must be at the centre of everything we do."
Many party activists argued, however, that the proposals echoed the Conservative government's policy of allowing schools to opt out of local education authority control.
Mary Wane, from Westmorland and Lonsdale, was given rapturous applause when she warned against the changes. "Please do not add any further disruption to our schools system by trying to impose a measure that is neither necessary nor desirable," she said.
Mrs Wane was scornful of suggestions that a vast "untapped reservoir" of people existed, just waiting to get involved, and argued that local communities were already involved in local schools in areas like hers.
Peter Downes, from Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, said the general reaction to the proposals had been to think: "What a barmy idea."
And he added: "My fear is that it is so blatantly absurd that it will undermine our credibility and distract attention away from our other proposals."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments