Lib Dem Conference: Delegates vote to take the fight to Labour
Despite their leader's call for closer co-operation with the Government , delegates put themselves at odds with the Blair project. Fran Abrams examines the policy gap
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In two debates that came after Paddy Ashdown urged representatives to move forward constructively with the Government, the conference voted to continue opposition to Labour.
First came a discussion of the Government's plans for a devolved London authority headed by an elected mayor. Although the Liberal Democrats want a new London government they voted to continue to campaign against a mayor.
They passed a motion calling for full proposals to be published in a bill before a planned referendum, for greater powers for the new body and for opposition to the mayor.
Paul Farthing, who is a councillor in London and who moved the motion, said the city needed regional government but not of Labour's kind.
"The presidential style model proposed by Labour risks the paralysis of government we often witness between the president of the United States and Congress. Forget strong government, forget weak government. I want a effective government," he said.
Representatives later heard that the "list" system of proportional representation proposed for the Scottish and Welsh parliaments - in which some candidates are directly elected and others are chosen by parties on a proportional basis - would be unfair.
The government's proposed electoral commission should be told by the Liberal Democrats that any new proportional system should be by Single Transferable Vote, in which losers' votes are redistributed.
Adrian Collett, Liberal Democrat leader on Hampshire County Council, said electoral deals would be done in "smoke-filled rooms" under Labour's plans.
"Either we mean what we said for all these years that electoral reform is about making our democracy meaningful again, about putting it into the hands of the people," he said, "...or we are just the self-seeking bunch of political cynics that our opponents in the media always said we were."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments