Letter: Mess that Shell cleaned up
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Anita Roddick uses a report from a campaigning group to shore up her argument (18 May). She writes: "Shell says it has not operated in Ogoni for four years, yet independent researchers found [its] legacy in drinking water polluted by oil effluents to levels 680 times higher than permitted European levels."
This, I assume, refers to a piece in the report which claims that a burst pipe at Ukpeleide (which is not in Ogoni) led to contamination of water. In fact this claim related only to the immediate vicinity of the burst pipe; we are left to assume a more widespread condition. Also, the leak was caused by sabotage (caught on video), not by Shell Nigeria, which acted to clean it up.
The report and Ms Roddick also talk of "arsenals of automatic weapons". These do not exist.
Karen de Segundo
Shell, London SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments