Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

`Legalised fraud' of lottery attacked

Diane Coyle
Wednesday 13 March 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

DIANE COYLE

Economics Editor

The National Lottery is little better than legalised fraud and should be abolished, according to one of the Chancellor's economic advisers.

Professor Tim Congdon, a member of the Treasury's panel of "wise people", said: "The National Lottery constitutes disguised taxation, redistributes from the poor to the rich, undermines savings and trivialises the state."

Professor Congdon's broadside on the lottery follows his growing criticism of the Government's interest rate policy. In a submission to the Treasury, he argued that last week's cut in the cost of borrowing would ultimately lead to inflation 3-4 per cent higher than our EU neighbours by 1999.

Writing today in the latest issue of the the journal of the Institute of Economic Affairs, Professor Congdon said a family which spent pounds 5 a week on the Lottery for 25 years, and reinvested any winnings, would have nothing in return.

On the other hand, if the family put pounds 5 into a standard insurance policy it would end up with more than pounds 30,000 over the same period.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in