Legal curb on phone masts
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
GOVERNMENT PLANS to give "fast-track" planning approval for dozens of mobile phone masts have been halted by a landmark judicial review in which the Department of the Environment was forced to admit that its decision-making process had been wrong, writes Colin Blackstock.
The admission means that many of the community groups campaigning against the building of these masts will now be able to seek judicial review of other planning applications that have been dealt with through the accelerated "Prior Approval" procedure.
The decision has pleased residents in Ballymacashen, Northern Ireland, who sought the review after the mobile phone company Orange erected a mast near a residential area last September after using the fast-track approach.
Their campaign was supported by the Northern Ireland Families Against Telecommunications Transmitters (Nifatt) who want to ensure that, in the future, phone masts are not erected within 300 to 500 metres of residential properties.
Margaret Dean, founder of Nifatt, said the decision was wonderful news for the residents. "It's a huge boost for our campaign and it gives us hope for the future. If the Government and industry won't listen to us, at least the courts have now recognised that if procedures aren't followed then they will decide it's illegal.
"We're not opposed to masts or mobile phones but we are opposed to putting them so close to people's homes and schools."
Most of the groups cam-paigning against such masts object to them on the grounds of possible health risks.
The priority approval procedure, which allows masts to be erected 28 days after planning application is sought, means that many communities find mobile phone masts erected close to housing and often with little consultation between residents and the companies installing the masts.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments