Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Left-right split on Nolan report

Patricia Wynn Davies Political Correspondent
Wednesday 25 October 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PATRICIA WYNN DAVIES

Political Correspondent

The committee of MPs considering the Nolan recommendations on disclosing outside earnings is deeply split along party lines, with Tory opposition threatening to rule out an agreed formula for implementation prior to a Commons debate in less than a fortnight.

Taking their cue from Tory backbench opinion, which MPs say is hardening against disclosure, Conservative members of the select committee have been holding out against the change in a series of fraught meetings over the last week. An inconclusive meeting last night will be followed by another marathon session tonight.

Labour members want full disclosure of annual income from outside interests, or disclosure within monetary bands, as recommended by Lord Nolan's Committee on Standards in Public Life.

But the gap between Labour and the Tory members has proved so difficult to bridge that the committee's report could end up containing up to six options for MPs to vote on - ranging from full disclosure to no disclosure - when it comes to the House before the end of the session early next month.

The debate was promised in July, when a majority of MPs on the select committee asked for more time to consider the Nolan report. Labour denounced the request as deliberate foot-dragging.

Among fall-back suggestions canvassed among Tories is that declarations of outside income should be made in confidence to the independent Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards recommended by Lord Nolan without being publicly recorded. Another suggestion is a simplified banding system to allow MPs to record earnings above or below that figure.

The Tories had hoped to win the argument against disclosure by agreeing with Labour that the range of banned outside activities should be widened to include single-client consultancies as well as multiple-client consultancies as recommended by Nolan. That would rule out any need to declare earnings, provided the relevant contracts were registered with the Commons. But Labour was understood to have ruled such a deal out last night.

A key figure in resolving the row will be the committee chairman, Tony Newton, Leader of the House. He will want a unanimous final report to put before the House, and his own report may sway Tory members.

A failure to reach agreement would be a blow to John Major who signalled a determination to clean up public life by setting up Lord Nolan's committee in the wake of the "cash for questions" affair.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in