Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lawyers told to ring up savings

Stephen Ward
Sunday 01 October 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Lord Woolf, the Law Lord behind plans for the biggest reform of civil justice this century, said judges and lawyers could save large amounts of time and money if they started to use telephones.

His Access to Justice proposals to the Government, after a year's consultation, include early meetings between judge, prosecution and defence to determine where a case is going. Speaking at the Bar Council's annual conference in London, Lord Woolf suggested technology would make meetings possible through video conferences, even if the judge was in Newcastle and the parties in London. He added: "We must manage the 98 per cent of cases which never come to trial." A case can take years to get to court. Most never make it, and are settled out of court after accruing massive legal bills.

Lord Woolf has also proposed fast-track courts for cases where damages claimed are less than pounds 10,000. In all cases judges, not lawyers, would control progress. Speaking to the audience of barristers, he said the greater control of case-length by judges should mean barristers quoting fixed fees, rather than charging by time. He also accused barristers of being over-paid. "I know of young men of a few years' experience who are earning more than a Law Lord," he said. Lord Woolf's salary is pounds 109,435. A recent survey of QCs in the magazine Legal Business, based on estimates from within the legal profession, found several earning more than pounds 1m a year, including the libel expert George Carmen. The Bar Council president, Peter Goldsmith, was estimated at between pounds 750,000 and pounds 1m. The Bar insists that only a handful of barristers earn big money, and many earn around pounds 20,000 a year.

Mr Goldsmith told the conference he was worried at the implication of giving judges a more managerial role. "Some judges you could give the papers on a Friday night and confidently come back for the judgment on Monday." Others were not so good.

Lord Williams of Mostyn, a prominent labour barrister, estimated that the money spent on training for judges would have to be doubled. Lord Woolf said this was a relatively small expense when set against savings involved. The Government is committed to making the reforms work, according to John Taylor, junior minister in the Lord Chancellor's department. However, he would not say if extra money would be spent on the courts.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in