Lawyers fear 'two-tier' defence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The controversial American-style "public defender" system is to be tried out in the United Kingdom for the first time as part of a cost-cutting shake-up of the legal aid scheme in Scotland.
Henry McLeish, the Scottish home affairs minister, said the system, under which an accused is represented by salaried lawyers employed by the public sector, would be piloted next year. At present, accused people on legal aid choose their own lawyers from firms in private practice. The study may only last five years, but the development is being widely seen as a precursor to the introduction of the system nationwide. Lawyers on both sides of the border have largely opposed any change. Cameron Fyfe, of Ross Harper & Murphy, a leading Glasgow firm, said: "We are going to have a two-tier system, with the rich choosing their lawyer and the poor being dumped with a public defender."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments