Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lawyer sustains vitriolic objection

Robert Verkaik
Monday 07 June 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IT WAS the election that nobody was talking about. At least, not until yesterday when it emerged that this year's contest for the Law Society's presidency would not be the one-horse procession everyone had expected.

Once news of an eleventh-hour challenger reached the ears of the sitting vice-president, Robert Sayer, the invective flowed thick and fast. Mr Sayer, apparently furious that he was no longer a shoo-in to lead the country's 70,000 solicitors, branded his opponentDavid Keating, a Hartlepool solicitor, "a complete pillock" who "falls asleep in [Law Society] council meetings."

Mr Sayer told The Lawyer magazine that the Law Society needs an election "like it needs a hole in the head". He described Mr Keating's challenge as "sneaky, underhand and pointless". In another outpouring of vitriol he said: "He [Keating] comes to council meetings, falls a sleep and goes home again."

Mr Sayer also had some colourful language for the man backing Mr Keating, Martin Mears, winner of the first contested Law Society elections in 1994. "Every year," said Mr Sayer, "Mears comes up like a piece of dog turd on your shoe."

Mr Mears said yesterday: "There's a general opinion in council - anyone who has seen Robert Sayer in action - that he's not the best man to represent the Law Society in public or deal with ministers."

Mr Keating said: "I am standing because of the feeling within some of the council and in the profession that Bob's not the right person for the job. I don't go to sleep in council meetings, although I may close my eyes when it gets tedious."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in