Labour accused of hiding truth on tax rises
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A TREASURY analysis of the family tax burden, so effectively used by Labour against the Tories for the last 17 years, has been ditched by the Government.
The decision, which has not been announced, was discovered by Malcolm Bruce, the Liberal Democrat spokesman, who last night condemned the action as a disgraceful cover-up.
"For years, Labour has been using these figures on the tax burden to expose the truth about tax rises.
"Now, with Labour in power, Gordon Brown has decided that he doesn't want to be judged by the yardsticks which he applied to the Tories, so instead of tackling the underlying issues, he has just abolished the statistics themselves."
The historical analysis of family tax burdens was so useful for MPs and academics that the House of Commons library even based one of its regular research papers on the Treasury replies.
Ironically, the first time the question was put in its most information- grabbing form was in 1981 when Jack Straw, now Home Secretary, asked for a breakdown of income tax, national insurance contributions, value added tax, other indirect taxes, and local council taxes as applied to average family samples, with and without children, on various fractions and multiples of average earnings.
Because the Tories were cutting direct taxes and switching the burden on to indirect taxes, Mr Straw's questions - and subsequent update requests down the years from Labour frontbenchers like Michael Meacher, Harriet Harman and Alistair Darling - allowed Labour to puncture Tory claims that they were cutting the tax burden on families, when it was clearly going up.
Mr Bruce said: "This is an abuse of power from a government which talks a good deal about openness and transparency, but practises an awful lot of evasion when it come to publishing information which it would rather just brush under the carpet."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments